You sit in the hardest seat in the food value chain when it comes to land emissions. The farms are upstream. The emission factor you use today was probably built for a different region than you source from.
And customer emissions data requests are arriving faster than supplier data can keep up.
The GHG Protocol’s LSR Standard was published 30 January 2026 and becomes effective 1 January 2027. It forces you to account for land use change and land management emissions explicitly, report them separately, and defend them to auditors, investors, and customers.
This guide shows you where to start.
What you'll get in our LSR guide for food processors:
- Commodity exposure map: cocoa, palm oil, soy, dairy ingredients, and meat/animal protein, with land use change (LUC) share ranges, key LSR challenges, and adjacent regulatory risks (EUDR, CSRD, SBTi FLAG).
- The sLUC to dLUC transition explained: why this single methodology change is the highest-impact shift for commodities with high deforestation exposure, with a region-by-region sensitivity matrix.
- Before/after inventory diagram: what disaggregated reporting looks like in practice for a food processor.
- Traceability as the real bottleneck: why ∼70% of supply chains are stuck on generic data, and how a staged approach works.
- Common pitfalls: five friction points specific to mid-stream processors and practical approaches to each.
Built on Real Implementations
A leading global tomato and vegetable processor, using Terrascope’s land emissions logic, discovered that land emissions accounted for 31% of its Scope 1-3 totals.
A plant-based beverage producer replaced generic global soybean emission factors with bespoke calculations reflecting local production conditions. The result: more accurate footprint baseline sand commercially meaningful differentiation.
