Your clients are asking for embodied carbon data. Most firms can't provide it.
Building codes and client requirements increasingly demand lifecycle carbon assessments. Engineering and architecture firms that can deliver this data win projects. Those that can't lose them.
“The partnership with Terrascope has been an amazing one from the beginning… We have carried out several CO2 emissions calculations together, but this is not where it is ending.”
Gianni Moor
Member, Board of Directors,
Tectus Group
Join a session with our experts
Take advantage of a 1-on-1 complimentary session with our sustainability team, designed to uncover and solve your company’s unique challenge
4-6 Weeks
vs. 6-12 months traditional typical FLAG submission time frame.
100% Pass Rate
for audit and SBTi Approvals
600M+
tonnes of CO₂ measured across customers
92%
Accuracy vs. actual supplier data when estimating
200K+ Emission Factors
with FLAG, LUC, & LM breakdowns
80%
reduction in measurement cycles
50x Faster
than traditional LCAs for product emissions
5x Faster
faster measurement and savings of up to USD160k
10 years
of sustainability experience Terrascope is an Olam venture.
Before Terrascope
After Terrascope
Embodied carbon capability
Outsourced, expensive
In-house, scalable
Material comparison
Generic databases
Supplier-specific EPDs
Client deliverables
Basic estimates
Full LCA reports
Project win rate
Losing RFPs
Competitive advantage
Time per assessment
Weeks
Hours
Building codes are moving faster than most firms can adapt
Embodied carbon requirements appearing in RFPs and building codes
Material EPDs are scattered and inconsistent
Lifecycle assessments are expensive and slow when outsourced
Steel and cement are CBAM-affected, changing material economics
Get the clarity to build your firm’s competitive edge
Material emissions database covering construction products
CBAM-ready for steel, cement, aluminum imports into EU
Lifecycle assessment capabilities at project scale
Supplier engagement for EPD collection
Integration with BIM and design tools
Reduce complexity and uncertainty, so you can focus on strategy, not spreadsheets
Material comparison in hours, not weeks
CBAM calculations for affected materials
Full project lifecycle from design to demolition
Audit-ready for building certification requirements
"Customers want product-level carbon footprints. broken out by land emissions categories. Our industry-average numbers make us look worse than competitotrs with farm-level data."
"We need to quantify progress vs our SBTi targets."
Farm-level emissions calculation to prove lower impact and win contracts
Proprietary, commodity-specific templates for farm-level data collection
16% Lower Emissions vs Industry Benchmark Custom EF development
130K line items in 2 weeks at 92% accuracy
Measured 5,000 SKUs in 100 minutes
16% Lower Emissions vs Industry Benchmark Custom EF development
130K line items in 2 weeks at 92% accuracy
Measured 5,000 SKUs in 100 minutes
Regulatory Requirements for Engineering & Architecture Companies
See which regulation applies to your jurisdiction, and what it means for your business.
Europe
Regulation
Deadline
What It Means
CBAM
Jan 2026
Steel, cement, aluminum certificates required. €100/tonne penalty. Affects all EU projects.
EPBD Recast
2027-2030
Whole-life carbon disclosure for new buildings. Embodied carbon limits coming.
CSRD
2025-2028
Large firms need sustainability reporting including project impacts.
United States
Regulation
Deadline
What It Means
California Buy Clean
Active
State-funded projects require EPDs for steel, glass, mineral wool. Expanding to other materials.
Federal Buy Clean
Active
Federal projects increasingly require embodied carbon disclosure.
Australia
Regulation
Deadline
What It Means
AASB S2
Jan 2025+
Large construction and engineering firms in scope.
Green Star
Ongoing
Industry standard increasingly requires lifecycle carbon assessment.
Singapore/APAC
Regulation
Deadline
What It Means
BCA Green Mark
Ongoing
Singapore building certification with embodied carbon requirements.
Japan ZEB/ZEH
2030 targets
Net-zero energy buildings pushing toward net-zero carbon.
FAQ
How does Terrascope help AEC firms replace spend-based Scope 3 estimates with activity/supplier data—without double counting?
Terrascope runs structured data campaigns to collect activity and supplier data, applies region-appropriate emission factors with version control, and supports supplier-specific remapping/overrides so categories use consistent factors. Terrascope also shows data coverage and sources and provides re-baselining guidance when methods change.
Can Terrascope deliver audit-ready outputs for CBAM and NGER, and provide defensible estimates when month-end data is delayed?
Yes. For CBAM, Terrascope produces an EU-template-aligned Excel (e.g., HS/CN codes, supplier/installation IDs), runs governed rolling data requests, and documents any use of transitional defaults. For NGER, outputs can include energy in GJ (including kWh→GJ conversions) with factor/version audit trails. When actuals are delayed, Terrascope can provide documented, site-level estimates using production-intensity models (accounting for shutdowns and site materiality), then back-solve once actuals land.
How does Terrascope integrate with SAP and bill-scanning tools, and support product-level PCF/BOM allocation and EPD preparation across multi-site operations?
Terrascope ingests manual or automated feeds, normalizes SAP and bill-scan outputs, and sets up recurring monthly ingestion with transformations and site/BU mapping (including flags for unattributed items). For PCF/BOM, the platform allocates shared site energy by product, supports packaging and recycled content, multi-mode transport, and custom factors, making annual refreshes easier. For EPD readiness, Terrascope combines supplier primary data with PCF outputs to populate EPD inputs and helps you start with priority products and scale.
/homepage/banyan-group-logo.png){kind=logo}
.png)
